Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Retention in HIV Primary Care: A Longitudinal Multisite Analysis.

We compared retention in care outcomes between a pre-COVID-19 (Apr19-Mar20) and an early-COVID-19 (Apr20-Mar21) period to determine whether the pandemic had a significant impact on these outcomes and assessed the role of patient sociodemographics in both periods in individuals enrolled in the Data for Care Alabama project (n = 6461). Using scheduled HIV primary care provider visits, we calculated a kept-visit measure and a missed-visit measure and compared them among the pre-COVID-19 and early-COVID-19 periods. We used logistic regression models to calculated odds ratios (OR) and accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CI). Overall, individuals had lowers odds of high visit constancy [OR (95% CI): 0.85 (0.79, 0.92)] and higher odds of no-shows [OR (95% CI): 1.27 (1.19, 1.35)] during the early-COVID-19 period. Compared to white patients, Black patients were more likely to miss an appointment and transgender people versus cisgender women had lower visit constancy in the early-COVID-19 period.

"If I have to drive 100 miles, I'll drive 100 miles to get it": a qualitative exploration of HIV care travel behavior.

ABSTRACTAlabama depends heavily on Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP) funding, yet patient enrollment at one large, RWHAP-funded, academically-affiliated HIV clinic in Alabama has steadily increased each year, with approximately 20% bypassing more proximal RWHAP clinics. To understand reasons why patients travel long distances and bypass closer clinics to receive care, we conducted eight focus groups over Zoom, each containing between 2-3 participants (n = 18) and applied thematic analysis to code the data. Primary themes included: (1) Reasons for Traveling Long Distances to Receive HIV Medical Care, (2) Experiences with HIV Medical Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and (3) Travel Challenges. Some participants were attracted by the clinic's one-stop-shop model, while others eschewed local clinics to avoid status disclosure. An overarching travel challenge was lack of transportation, yet most participants favored in-person appointments over telehealth despite driving long distances. Future research should explore patient attitudes towards telehealth in greater depth.

Role of Visit Modality in the HIV-Related No-Shows During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study.

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid expansion of telehealth as part of healthcare delivery. This study compared HIV-related no-shows by visit type (in-person; video; telephone) during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020-September 2021) from the Data for Care Alabama project. Using all primary care provider visits, each visit's outcome was categorized as no-show or arrived. A logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations accounting for repeat measures in individuals and within sites calculated odds ratios (OR) and their accompanying 95% confidence interval (CI) for no-shows by visit modality. The multivariable models adjusted for sociodemographic factors. In-person versus telephone visits [OR (95% CI) 1.64 (1.48-1.82)] and in-person versus video visits [OR (95% CI) 1.53 (1.25-1.85)] had higher odds of being a no-show. In-person versus telephone and video no-shows were significantly higher. This may suggest success of telehealth visits as a method for HIV care delivery even beyond COVID-19.

Addressing HIV and Homelessness During COVID-19: A Community-Based Demonstration Project.

People experiencing homelessness are at increased risk for HIV, and people with HIV (PWH) experiencing homelessness are more likely to experience suboptimal HIV health outcomes than PWH with stable housing. Within Alabama, a state prioritized in the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative, Jefferson County consistently has the highest number of new HIV diagnoses as well as a high percentage of the state's homeless population. To address the twin epidemics of both HIV and homelessness within the high-priority setting of Jefferson County, Alabama, this 1-year community-based project, Ending the HIV Epidemic: Addressing HIV Health and Homelessness (AH3), sought to increase HIV testing and linkage to care among this population by placing a full-time case manager trained in HIV testing and case management at a homeless shelter. Results demonstrated that HIV testing was highly acceptable: 733 individuals were offered a test, and only 2.7% (n = 20) declined. Nine previously diagnosed, out of care PWH and one newly diagnosed PWH were identified through AH3 testing efforts. Of these, five (50%) were linked to care at a local HIV clinic. The remaining five PWH left the shelter before they could be linked to care. Just 10 shelter guests expressed interest in taking PrEP (just 1.4% of guests who tested negative for HIV), and only one of these linked to PrEP care. Future health promotion programs are needed to address mental health and other ancillary needs among this population, as well as programs that provide access to PrEP and other HIV prevention services.

Community-engaged Processes for Restarting Federally Funded Research in a Community-based Organization during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Birmingham AIDS Outreach (BAO) is one of three study sites partnering with the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health (Pitt Public Health) for a National Institutes of Health-funded randomized controlled trial on a financial management intervention for people with HIV who are experiencing homelessness or housing instability. After the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in March 2020, the study team used a community-engaged approach to adapt research protocols at this site. We sought to describe a community-engaged approach to restarting National Institutes of Health-funded research during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Partners at Pitt Public Health and BAO developed a set of agency-wide COVID-19 policies and procedures for BAO organized around Rhodes' critical elements of community engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The challenges presented by COVID-19 in the research sector have provided an opportunity to reevaluate study activities and increase the extent to which research is conducted in a community-centered manner.